Iron Jawed Angels Film Analysis - 1302 Words

Iron Jawed Angels is the moving 2004 film that highlights how Alice Paul and Lucy Burns fought for womens suffrage. In the film, director Katja von Garnier, follows these women and the efforts they put forth as members of the National American Woman Suffrage Association (NAWSA) and later the work they did as founders of the National Womans Party (NWP). The film showcases the trials that Alice Paul and Lucy Burns had to overcome, not just from opposition found within NAWSA, but also among society and in politics. The film begins with Alice Paul, played by Hilary Swank, and Lucy Burns, played by Frances OConner, arriving from England where they had formerly been involved in the womens suffrage movement. They arrive in the United States with the goal of using what they learned in England and applying similar strategic techniques to their campaigns. Initially, the duo are active members of NAWSA, led by Carrie Chapman Catt played by Angelica Huston, however, as their approach and tactics become more aggressive, and they become independently successful as a branch of the organization, Catt voices her displeasure with Paul and Burns approach, which leads them to separate from the organization in order to establish their own, politically aggressive party, the National Womens Party, whose sole agenda is to focus on making womens suffrage an issue within politics and society and getting an amendment passed that guarantees people the right to vote regardless of sex (IronShow MoreRelatedWomen Of The American Revolution1960 Words   |  8 PagesIn the past, women would be unable to do things for themselves without the permission of their husbands. Also, since women were not the breadwinners they would have to ask their husbands for funds in order to spend money. We see this in the film Iron-Jawed Angels where the senator takes away his wife’s money when she starts investing to help women’s rights. She had become unhappy when she was dependent on her husband who had taken her kids away, so she left and joined the women’s rights movement.

Socrates Guilty or Innocent of Charges Essay - 2093 Words

Socrates: Was He Guilty or Innocent of the Crimes He Was Charged With? Most of the information that we learn about Socrates comes from the work and writings of one of his students, Plato. It has been alleged that the great Philosopher wrote nothing down for others to read, and as such, the knowledge and the teachings from Socrates that is relied upon to convey his philosophy and the epic story of his life comes not from himself, but his students who attempt to provide and accurate picture of the methods and philosophical beliefs held by their mentor and teacher. The Apology is one of the many written dialogues written by Plato that discuss how Socrates was arrested and charged with corrupting the youth of Athens; teaching†¦show more content†¦However, his defense lacked meaning for the jurors and was met with disbelief. Plato, himself, wonders if Socrates in a sense, was his own worst enemy by making statements contrary, stating that he had attained a type of wisdom that the jurors lacked and that was a solid awareness of his own ignorance an d lack of knowledge. The goal of Socrates never ending questions, it appears, is to help the common person achieve the self knowledge that he had acquired, even if it ended up hurting himself in the end. He attempts to use his Sophist thinking in his defense, not understanding himself that this way of logically thinking rarely if ever is successful unless you are speaking with, or arguing against shares your way of thinking and philosophy. Although, I truly believe that the death sentence was barbaric and unnecessary, it really was Socrates who determined his own fate. Even after his conviction he refused to sway from his philosophical ideologies and belief system. Given the choice of being exiled from Athens or committing himself to abandon his techniques of talking with and questioning others openly, he maintained that and unexamined life is not worth living, (Apology 38a) and would rather die that not practice and teach his Philosophy to others. Platos highly regarded depic tion of a man willing to faceShow MoreRelated Argument in the Apology Essay897 Words   |  4 Pagesphilosopher Plato is whether, notorious speaker and philosopher Socrates is corrupting the youth by preaching ungodly theories and teaching them unlawful ideas that do harm to individuals and society. In his words Socrates quoted the prosecution’s accusation against him: â€Å"Socrates is guilty of corrupting the minds of the young, and of believing in supernatural things of his own invention instead of the gods recognized by the state.† 1 Further Socrates consistently introduces tediously compiled number of examplesRead MoreSocrates Trial Essay807 Words   |  4 PagesApology Socrates was charged and put on trial for impiety, as well as accused of committing many other crimes. I will first explain the most important issues of why Socrates was sent to death. Then I will argue the position that Socrates is innocent, and should not be have been found guilty. To introduce, Socrates was placed on trial and charged with the crime of impiety. Impiety is the lack of reverence for the gods and other sacred things. As well another major claim was that Socrates was corruptingRead MoreEssay Is Socrates Guilty As Charged?1134 Words   |  5 Pagesquot;Is Socrates Guilty As Charged?quot; nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;In any case of law, when one is considering truth and justice, one must first look at the validity of the court and of the entity of authority itself. In Socrates case, the situation is no different. One may be said to be guilty or not of any said crime, but the true measure of guilt or innocence is only as valid as the court structure to which it is subject to. Therefore, in considering whether Socrates is guilty or notRead More The Apology of Socrates: Guilty or Innocent? Essay928 Words   |  4 PagesThe Apology of Socrates: Guilty or Innocent?   Ã‚   In any case of law, when considering truth and justice, one must first look at the validity of the court and the system itself.   In Socrates case, the situation is no different.   One may be said to be guilty or innocent of any crime, but guilt or innocence is only as valid as the court it is subjected to.   Therefore, in considering whether Socrates is guilty or not, it must be kept in mind the norms and standards of Athens at that time, and theRead MoreEssay on Socrates Was NOT Guilty1667 Words   |  7 Pages   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Socrates, in his conviction from the Athenian jury, was both innocent and guilty as charged. In Plato’s Five Dialogues, accounts of events ranging from just prior to Socrates’ entry into the courthouse up until his mouthful of hemlock, both points are represented. Socrates’ in dealing with moral law was not guilty of the crimes he was accused of by Meletus. Socrates was only guilty as charged because his peers had concluded him as such. The laws didn’t find Socrates guilty; Socrates was guiltyRead MoreIs Socrates Innocent or Guilty? Essay1379 Words   |  6 PagesIs Socrates Innocent or Guilty? Living in a democracy, everyone is exposed through television and other various forms of media everyday to numerous trials by jury. Usually they are rarely given a second thought, but every once in a while along comes a specific trial which captures the attention of the entire country. This goes the same for trials throughout centuries in our past. Although they did not have the same forms of media as in this, modern era, there were still specific trials inRead MoreA Just Man Should Fear No Death in the Apology by Plato Essay825 Words   |  4 Pagesby Plato, and relates Socrates’ defense at his trial on charges of corrupting the youth and impiety. Socrates argues that he is innocent of both charges. His defense is ultimately unsuccessful, and he is convicted and sentenced to death. Socrates concludes the Apology by arguing that a just man should have no fear of death. Socrates defends himself against the charges brought against him by his prosecutor Meletus in two ways. One way consists of a description of Socrates’ motivation and methodRead MoreThe Trial of Socrates1543 Words   |  7 PagesIn the trial of Socrates, I juror number 307, Ryan Callahan vote the defendant is Not Guilty on the first charge of Corrupting the youth. My justifications for this vote are as follows. Socrates didn t corrupt the youth, he just shared his ideas with them and they in turn chose the path to take these ideas. Part of understanding this case is understand the time in which the case was held. This time being 399 B.C., a time in which Athens was a free democratic city, a town which prided itselfRead MoreSocrates Accusers Essay800 Words   |  4 Pages399 BC, Socrates was executed on charges of not believing in the same Gods as Athenians, and for being a bad influence on the young. Were these charges just and fair? No, they were not. Socrates was not guilty of these charges. In fact, in the presence of his accusers, Socrates proved that he was an innocent man and was simply in the process of carrying out his mission to share truth in an attempt to improve the lives of his neighbors. Though with no avail, Socrates was still found guilty of crimesRead MoreEssay on A Hoax in Court: The Trial of Socrates1547 Words   |  7 PagesAlbert Einstein quoted, â€Å"In matters of truth and justice, there is no difference between large and small problems, for issues concerning the treatment of people are all the same† (Brainy Quote). Were justice and truth a part of Socrates’ trial? The primary question is: what is justice? According to Merriam-Webster dictionary, the definition of justice is: â€Å"the administration of law, especially the establishment or determination of rights according to the rules of law or equity.† Meletus brought

Andrew Warhol Art Or Not Art Essay Example For Students

Andrew Warhol Art Or Not Art Essay The American artist Andy Warhol was born Andrew Warhola in 1928. There has been quite a bit confusion to where and when Andy Warhol was born, but according to Andy’s birth certificate that was filed in Pittsburgh in 1945, he was born on August 6th in Pittsburgh. Whether or not this is the day he was born hasn’t been proved, but it was on this day he would celebrate his birthday. However, there is no doubt that he died on February 22nd, 1987, at New York Hospital after a gallbladder operation. â€Å"He is considered a founder and major figure of the POP ART movement.† But is his art considered art or just a duplication of items? In 1960 he produced the first of his paintings depicting enlarged comic strip images- such as Popeye and Superman- initially for use in a window display. Warhol pioneered the development of the process whereby an enlarged photographic image is transferred to a silk screen that is then placed on a canvas and inked from the back. It was this technique that enabled him to produce the series of mass-media images- repetitive, yet with slight variations- that he began in 1962. These, included such items as Campbell’s Soup cans, dollar bills, Coca-Cola bottles, and the faces of celebrities, can be taken as a comments on the banality, harshness, an ambiguity of American Culture. The Campbell’s Soup is one of the most famous and recognized paintings of Warhol. It was done in 1962 and is oil on canvas. â€Å"This painting defines his personal artistic repertoire of low cost consumer items. The soupcan is a mass market article of the American consumer and a recognizable symbol of Americans way of life.† However, is this art or a duplication of a soupcan? It does symbolize America, but a replication of a soupcan is not considered art in my eyes. He’s imitating a picture that another person created and taking credit for the idea. That’s like saying one report is an original, but if another person copied it and took credit for the report, it’s plagiarism. That’s not fair to the person who designed the label and not being acknowledged for his/her work. Now, if Warhol had added his own techniques or own style to the soupcan, then that would be different. It’s like the original, the colors are the same, and the letteri ng is the same. Nevertheless, he didn’t include his ‘way’ and that would be considered copying.

Life or Death an Example of the Topic Psychology Essays by

Life or Death by Expert BrilliantEssays | 13 Dec 2016 Right to life is something that most people will agree upon. Not simply because everyone agrees on its meaning and implication but because it is a positive right which is necessary to stay alive. On the other hand, the right to die is also a positive assertion but it connotes a negative action, thus people often disagree if it is necessary, beneficial and practical. The right to die is almost always discussed in issues which concerns, euthanasia, suicide, abortion and war. There is a prevalent view that since death is part of life then the right to die is a part of the right to life. Therefore if one will accept that all human beings have a right to life, then they also have a right to die. Need essay sample on "Life or Death" topic? We will write a custom essay sample specifically for you Proceed Nonetheless, this view falls under the category of the logical fallacy known as slippery slope wherein the arguer tries to argue that by admitting that statement A exists or is true, it follows that statement B also exists or is true; through a series of logical arguments or vagueness of the term (Curtis, 2008). Death can be viewed as a part of life yet some may argue that death is the end of life which is beyond life itself and therefore beyond the right to life argument. The right to life in itself is still under debate due to its application/s and implication/s. The basis of the legality of right to life is the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) (United Nations, 2008). This declaration and covenant are internationally acclaimed and adapted by their signatories who validate their respective legality in different countries and/or nations. With this in mind, it can be surmised that right to life only exist legally in nations who are signatory of the UDHR and the ICCPR. The United States Declaration of Independence also mentioned that humans have inherent right to life; making right to life an inalienable legal right (UShistory.org, 2008). I do not agree that death is a part of life. I believe that death is actually the termination of life or a point beyond life. Therefore, I also disagree with right to die in general which undermines the ability of a person o choose the time and manner of their own death. Nonetheless, there are cases wherein a person is better to die than to live; such as the case of (definite) terminally ill persons. Euthanasia is a more probable solution to be able to lessen pain, discomfort and financial burden to the whole family (Equality and Human Rights Commission, 2008). In this case, a person may waived his rights, including his right to life and therefore choose the time and manner of his death. By joining the army or national defense, I believe that a person have already accepted the possibility of death in the course of duty. Aside from this two, I believe that a person do not and should not have the right to choose the manner and time of his/her death. References: Curtis, GN. (2008). Slippery Slope. Retrieved on October 28, 2008, from http://www.fallacyfiles.org/slipslop.html. Equality and Human Rights Commission. Right to Life. Retrieved on October 28, 2008. United Nation. (2008). Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). Retrieved on October 27, 2008 from http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html. UShistory.org. (2008). The Declaration of Independence. Retrieved on October 28, 2008, from http://www.ushistory.org/Declaration/.